Template for Review of Journal Article Essay

IntroductionGive an overview of the bind. festeringWhat are the cay points in this obligate?What did I find striking or enkindle about these key points? How applic competent are the key points to my post as a teacher?What do I agree or disagree with in this name?How has this phrase influenced me in thought deeply about my values, beliefs and assumptions? How specifically ordaining I be able to spend the entropy and knowledge to better or enhance my teaching and information in terms of approaches, strategies, methods or techniques? ConclusionWhat juvenile insights/discoveries have I made in relation to article review? How will I make use of this new-sprung(prenominal) knowledge in future?What march on information or knowledge should I seek to expand my knowledge in relation to the satisfys of this article?N.B. minimum of 2 pages (A4) or 800 words, Font surface 12, 1 margin all round. disport review FIVE articles as proposed and charter to Mr. Chee by Week-10, as y our GROUP assignment.ORPlease review ONE article as proposed and submit to Mr. Chee by Week-10, as your INDIVIDUAL assignment.Rubrics for Assessing Journal Article critical reviewGradingDescription of Quality of readyExcellent (A)80 and abovein truth clear focus and clarity of thoughts and expression. find points are well developed and expound in detail. Excellent analysis of article national that is discerning, in-depth and supported by two pedagogical and personal knowledge. Ability to revive gist to ones grapheme and competencies as a teacher is demonstrate in an outstanding manner. thither is a high quality of theorizeion as can be seen in the susceptibility to relate to ones values, beliefs and experiences to the content of the article. The reviewer is able to suggest how the information and knowledge could be adopted or adapted innovatively to enhance or improve teaching and learning. Personal insights and views that are de nonative try out that the reviewer has thought critically and reflectively about the article and the do on his/her post as a researcher.The review is clear, well organized with crystalline sequencing and elaboration of key points. All key points are adequately detailed and thither is in-depth analysis of nearly of the points. Good causa has also been made to relate the content of the article to ones role and competencies as a teacher and interesting ideas were proposed for improving or enhancing management. Insights and discoveries made show a substantially understanding of the article content and that that the reviewer has made good effort to reflect on his/her values, beliefs and experiences.There is adequate analysis of the article content but with some points detailed more(prenominal) than others. Relationship is drawn between some key points and ones role and competencies as a researcher. The reviewer was able to suggest how the information and knowledge could be applied in teaching and learning to improve o r enhance sure practices. Overall, the review is satisfactory in that it shows an boilers suit understanding of the content and the ability to reflect on the content to obtain adequate benefits as a researcher.Unsatisfactory (F) under 60The review is lacking in focus and clarity of expression. Key points not elaborated upon and details are minimal. minor analysis of content. Minimal reflection and insights given.